3 ms·
We actually need to decouple ourselves such that such threats can be ignored.
by vachina 1mo ago
We actually need to decouple ourselves such that such threats can be ignored.
- JumpCrisscross 1mo ago> We actually need to decouple ourselves We’re in a globalized world with aircraft carriers and nuclear weapons. The fallacy of thinking a major economy (or significant nation) can decouple from any expansionist regime is a lesson I thought we learned from the first half of the last century.
- mitxela 1mo agoUS weapons are near useless due to prolonged institutional corruption, just like Russian ones. This was learned from Iran.
- JumpCrisscross 1mo ago> US weapons are near useless due to prolonged institutional corruption, just like Russian ones At invading or achieving any geopolitical objective, yes (though I wouldn’t compare the American military-industrial base to Russia’s). At causing at least as much chaos as sanctions, no.
- ben_w 1mo agoDifferent kinds of failure. The Russian weapons (at various points) were missing critical components, maintenance, fuel, etc. The US weapons appear to have functioned as specified, but the commander-in-chief appears to know marginally less about the Iranian strategic situation than I personally do. And this is not a boast, I have zero military training and only follow the occasional commentator like Anders Puck Nielsen and read the odd Wikipedia page when something surprising comes up in the news or a comment, and pay enough attention to the news and comments to be capable of surprise, it's just that I asked someone around 20 years ago if the War On Terror would go to Iran given all the obvious threads leading there, and they told me it would go down basically as we saw it going down this year: very expensive, no real progress, strategic failure no matter what military victories happen.