3 ms·
If you think an LLM can just implement e.g. an alternative to the Linux kernel from scratch (or any other GPL licensed software), you might be falling for the m
by lionkor 28d ago
If you think an LLM can just implement e.g. an alternative to the Linux kernel from scratch (or any other GPL licensed software), you might be falling for the marketing.
Have you seen LLMs build large, stable, pieces of software, that work well, with your own eyes? I have not. I have seen LLMs build small, well-understood things, and I've seen LLMs do super well with extremely well specified problems, but all the rest seems to be marketing (i.e. I couldn't observe or reproduce it).
Edit: I'm not talking about throwaway slop that just needs to run long enough to get funding.
- amazingamazing 28d agoBun was rewritten for software used by millions.
- meindnoch 28d agoMechanical translation.
- amazingamazing 28d agoIt was done with LLMs.
- f311a 28d agoA lot of open source that we used to use as dependencies is trivial. Sometimes you only need 10% of the library. No one is talking about kernel. Also, changing license does not prevent you from forking the source code before the change. There are no new libraries with kernel level effort that use uncommon license.