"you probably shouldn’t let it write it for you if you actually expect the rest of us to read it." definitely resonates with me. Where I kind of disagree is th

"you probably shouldn’t let it write it for you if you actually expect the rest of us to read it." definitely resonates with me. Where I kind of disagree is that I don't think most readers will revolt. I think the mountain of LLM slop has actually changed people's behavior in more ways than one. Some are already relying on LLMs to summarize articles: then it doesn't matter to them who wrote it, they're just consuming machine-condensed content with no way to tell if a human or an LLM wrote the original piece. Or if their summarizer hallucinated.