We would all act to defend ourselves physically; we would not all act to "defend" copyright. People infringe copyright all the time, and others simply reject wh

We would all act to defend ourselves physically; we would not all act to "defend" copyright. People infringe copyright all the time, and others simply reject what they cannot copy easily. There was enough disagreement to dislodge the right to own people from the right to own property. Is there enough agreement to keep copyright?