3 ms·
Identical is the point here. The test of 'identical' to me is going to be mass production with economies of scale. I surely don't have the equipment to test wh
by fooker 1mo ago
Identical is the point here.
The test of 'identical' to me is going to be mass production with economies of scale. I surely don't have the equipment to test whether it's identical, nor would I trust the marketing.
- ozyschmozy 1mo agoWhat does that have to do with the price? If it's mass produced, widely available, thoroughly tested, and the same price as regular meat, why wouldn't you prefer it?
- fooker 1mo agoEverything in history that was mass produced was priced more than an order of magnitude lower than the 'original'. I don't see artificial meat being the first exception to this. I'd see 'same price as meat' being an indication of something going wrong here.
- ozyschmozy 1mo agoAre you implying that the meat industry as it is currently, producing nearly 400 million tonnes of meat annually, isn't mass production? Why would we assume that lab grown meat, even if it's mass produced, would be much cheaper than that well oiled machine?
- fooker 1mo agoBecause it wouldn't involve handling live animals, could be significantly more automated, would not need as much real estate, would eliminate wastage of the parts we don't really consume, could be done at larger scales in a more centralized way where energy is cheaper, the stages could be pipelined with processing/packing/etc happening at the same place. I'm sure there are a dozen other reasons I didn't immediately think of.