4 ms·
The assumption here being that big companies can simply "clone" another business. In reality, this is not the case.
by dreamdu5t 14y ago
The assumption here being that big companies can simply "clone" another business. In reality, this is not the case.
- carbocation 14y agoIn this specific case, Snapchat vs FB Poke, it really is the case.
- rohamg 14y agoSnapchat is a product, not yet a business.
- carbocation 14y agoIt's the only part of the business (which is also named Snapchat) that's worth cloning. Or are you suggesting that we're talking about something else?
- rohamg 14y agoi was merely correcting that Facebook copied the product. If SnapChat had a business (users + revenue + customers + relationships + goodwill), it would have been much more difficult to "copy".
- carbocation 14y agoYour definition of 'business' excludes many, if not most, startups.
- rohamg 14y agothat's why we call them startups