5 ms·

> in India where the vast majority of people either eat no meat or only chicken/fish That is such a misleading comment. ~80% of people in India consume meat. T

• Der_Einzige 21d ago
  They consume far less meat and the specific types are the uniquely least polluting types Chicken/Fish produce an order of magnitude or in some cases two orders of magnitude less pollution than cows do. Trying to gaslight me on this topic even though I'm right on the part that matters. the "or" stands in for the context of the fact that Chicken/fish are an order of magnitude healthier for the planet, and frankly, for individuals.
  • tekla 21d ago
    > They consume far less meat and the specific types are the uniquely least polluting types Your claim was that 3rd world countries like India "are already eating de-facto vegetarian or vegan diets" which is incorrect. Moving goalposts > Chicken/Fish produce an order of magnitude or in some cases two orders of magnitude less pollution than cows do. Cool, irrelevant because the vast majority in India are neither vegetarian or vegan. > Trying to gaslight me on this topic even though I'm right on the part that matters This is called "being incorrect but trying to move goalposts"
  • throw8393739 21d ago
    > Chicken/Fish produce an order of magnitude or in some cases two orders of magnitude less pollution than cows do. Cows are not for eating, they are holy animals in India, more like pets. I hope you are not advocating eating dogs in west!
  • senordevnyc 21d ago
    Not remotely what gaslighting means
  • stackghost 21d ago
    Veganism would be more popular if vegans weren't so insufferable.
    • partyficial 20d ago
      the suffering of the animals being killed for your tastebuds outweighs your suffering of the "vegan-high-horse".