3 ms·

Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience. Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence

by imrehg 21d ago

Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience. Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence for free and open source software, free and open source hardware, or free cultural works", and "You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools". They also only provide private repos where the FOSS system need it for their infra or what not, and not just for any purpose. These are totally fine for Codeberg to do, and it's wonderful for FOSS!! However it is not a viable place for many projects that are on GitHub/GitLab now and would want to migrate, say: any commercial project, that would need "permission-free" private repos, or when the teams want to decided themselves how much generative AI their developers should use, not their Git-hosting provider... So yeah, different ballpark. [0]: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse.md https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse...

VCFundedGenYer 21d ago
Not a problem if you don't ask a robot to write code for you.
- bsoqk 21d ago
  They also don’t allow code about cryptocurrencies. They are strongly ideology-focused and it’s a matter of time they ban something you want to upload.
  - ragall 21d ago
    That's entirely fine.
    - mrldkgkskld 21d ago
      Legally it’s fine to discriminate against some things, yes. Morally, that’s not very clear, it might actually not be entirely fine.
      - ragall 20d ago
        It actually, clearly, is.
    - sneak 21d ago
      No, the general concept of arbitrary censorship by web hosts isn’t fine at all.
      - ragall 20d ago
        This isn't arbitrary and isn't censorship, you moron.
        sneak 20d ago
        How is it not? A platform deciding on a whim what sort of content can get your hosted site banned? That’s the definition of arbitrary and the definition of censorship. It’s not government censorship, but it’s censorship nonetheless.
        ragall 19d ago
        It's not "on a whim", it's clearly and publicly documented. That's not censorship.
        deleted 13d ago
        [deleted]
hexfish 21d ago
pushin's home page does mention that they 'block slop'. I wonder who decides what slop is, and how?
- jeremyjh 21d ago
  They mean AI spam PRs.

by imrehg 21d ago

VCFundedGenYer 21d ago

Not a problem if you don't ask a robot to write code for you.

bsoqk 21d ago
They also don’t allow code about cryptocurrencies. They are strongly ideology-focused and it’s a matter of time they ban something you want to upload.
- ragall 21d ago
  That's entirely fine.
  - mrldkgkskld 21d ago
    Legally it’s fine to discriminate against some things, yes. Morally, that’s not very clear, it might actually not be entirely fine.
    - ragall 20d ago
      It actually, clearly, is.
  - sneak 21d ago
    No, the general concept of arbitrary censorship by web hosts isn’t fine at all.
    - ragall 20d ago
      This isn't arbitrary and isn't censorship, you moron.
      - sneak 20d ago
        How is it not? A platform deciding on a whim what sort of content can get your hosted site banned? That’s the definition of arbitrary and the definition of censorship. It’s not government censorship, but it’s censorship nonetheless.
        ragall 19d ago
        It's not "on a whim", it's clearly and publicly documented. That's not censorship.
        deleted 13d ago
        [deleted]

hexfish 21d ago

pushin's home page does mention that they 'block slop'. I wonder who decides what slop is, and how?

jeremyjh 21d ago
They mean AI spam PRs.