2 ms·
Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience. Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence
by imrehg 2mo ago
Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience.
Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence for free and open source software, free and open source hardware, or free cultural works", and "You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools". They also only provide private repos where the FOSS system need it for their infra or what not, and not just for any purpose.
These are totally fine for Codeberg to do, and it's wonderful for FOSS!!
However it is not a viable place for many projects that are on GitHub/GitLab now and would want to migrate, say: any commercial project, that would need "permission-free" private repos, or when the teams want to decided themselves how much generative AI their developers should use, not their Git-hosting provider...
So yeah, different ballpark.
[0]: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse.md https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse...
- VCFundedGenYer 2mo agoNot a problem if you don't ask a robot to write code for you.
- bsoqk 2mo agoThey also don’t allow code about cryptocurrencies. They are strongly ideology-focused and it’s a matter of time they ban something you want to upload.
- ragall 2mo agoThat's entirely fine.
- mrldkgkskld 2mo agoLegally it’s fine to discriminate against some things, yes. Morally, that’s not very clear, it might actually not be entirely fine.
- ragall 2mo agoIt actually, clearly, is.
- sneak 2mo agoNo, the general concept of arbitrary censorship by web hosts isn’t fine at all.
- ragall 2mo agoThis isn't arbitrary and isn't censorship, you moron.
- sneak 2mo agoHow is it not? A platform deciding on a whim what sort of content can get your hosted site banned? That’s the definition of arbitrary and the definition of censorship. It’s not government censorship, but it’s censorship nonetheless.
- ragall 2mo agoIt's not "on a whim", it's clearly and publicly documented. That's not censorship.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- hexfish 2mo agopushin's home page does mention that they 'block slop'. I wonder who decides what slop is, and how?
- jeremyjh 2mo agoThey mean AI spam PRs.