4 ms·
I was really hoping for Astra to be less expensive then Opus...
by friendlypenguin 1mo ago
I was really hoping for Astra to be less expensive then Opus...
- redox99 1mo agoIt is (uses way less tokens)
- simianwords 1mo agoNo it isn't cheaper, any source for task vs price comparison to Sol? Edit: GPT-6 Astra (low): 57 Intelligence Index, $7.70/M tokens GPT-5.6 Sol (high): 57 Intelligence Index, $3.08/M tokens So for the same measured intelligence, Sol costs only 40% as much — i.e. ~60% cheaper, while Astra is ~2.5× more expensive. Why is the burden of proof on me tho!?
- wickedsight 1mo agoThis is the second comment I see where you write "no it isn't", without providing a source for your statement. Then you follow it by asking for a source. So is there a source you can provide to back up your statement?
- dgellow 1mo agoIt’s supposed to work the other way, if you make a positive claim that it is cheaper, where is your proof?
- haaz 1mo agoAstra is obviously better than sol. Look at the benchmarks, astra medium costs the same as sol X high whilst costing the same per task https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/releases/gpt-6-astra https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/releases/gpt-6-astra
- slopinthebag 1mo agothey said opus, not sol, it's cheaper than opus by almost half at max. astra high is also 3x cheaper than opus max at basically the same intelligence. astra high is also about as expensive as sol max while being more intelligent. astra medium is cheaper than sol max while also being cheaper and roughly same intelligence. im going to replace my sol usage with astra high/medium i think caveat: benchmarks are really fuzzy with llms
- ygty 29d agoWhy do you always write shit posts but never respond when called out?