3 ms·
Would be great to spend some money (other people's money) on paying some illustrators and artists to do the same for comparison. It could be straight images con
by bahmboo 1mo ago
Would be great to spend some money (other people's money) on paying some illustrators and artists to do the same for comparison. It could be straight images converted to SVG or direct vector graphics.
- Gander5739 1mo agoDoesn't that somewhat miss the point? The models can't see and check their work, for instance.
- bahmboo 1mo agoI'm not clear what you are saying. I am curious about what humans can do in the same context. It's becoming a standard I think for some tasks. E.g. how does a Gen AI stack up against a human in quality and "cost". Perhaps I'm missing what you are asking.
- spockz 1mo agoThey can. Ask them to generate SVG , call a renderer and let them inspect the bitmap/png. They can learn about it.
- Gander5739 1mo agoThey can, but for this specifc test, they don't. It's a oneshot with no feedback.
- WarmWash 1mo agoTechnically you would pay programmers to write SVG code with no visual feedback if you want a straight 1:1 comparison.
- bahmboo 1mo agoKinda. It's the difference between measuring the end product vs how it's made.