2 ms·

Despite what people are saying here, chrome has a really excellent track record. Nobody is perfect. Switching just because chrome got exploited one time will li

by bawolff 1mo ago

Despite what people are saying here, chrome has a really excellent track record. Nobody is perfect. Switching just because chrome got exploited one time will likely result in you switching to something worse. If you're paranoid, disable JIT.

dwattttt 1mo ago
Or disable JS altogether, and enjoy many sites working much quicker. Many others fail & need to be selectively allowed, but it's been worth it.
- doublerabbit 1mo ago
  If by quicker you mean blank content, I'll agree, it is worth it.
  - dwattttt 1mo ago
    Somehow I don't think you've tried, if you think all I get is blank content.
  - dwattttt 1mo ago
    Actually thinking back, I get _more_ content, because there's a notable number of access screens that just don't function with JS off, leaving the whole article available.
jacquesm 1mo ago
It's not about switching because chrome got exploited one time, it's about switching not to reward unethical behavior.
- bawolff 1mo ago
  well one someone posts on an article about an exploit in chrome saying that the exploit is a reason to switch, i think its fair to say its not about "not reward[ing] unethical behaviour"