2 ms·
This is a very Harrison Bergeron outcome, enforcing equality with a least common denominator. I wonder how many bureaucrats could read that story as a guidebook
by delichon 29d ago
This is a very Harrison Bergeron outcome, enforcing equality with a least common denominator. I wonder how many bureaucrats could read that story as a guidebook.
- fuzzfactor 29d ago>how many bureaucrats could read that story as a guidebook. All of them This required a solution so creative and comprehensive that it took 32 months of many stakeholders and the best legal minds they could get. If you can't add access for all, then add barriers for all. Too bad the regulators didn't spell out plainly that the default under imperfect conditions is always more barriers not less. They should have made it obvious that the law primarily requires more barriers the whole time without having to waste almost 3 years to achieve clarity. And the additional barriers have to be so effective even the most able-bodied can't overcome them. It's the law. I liked it better when there were more able-minded regulators.
- kube-system 29d agoOr maybe the designers of the booths could have simply familiarized themselves with the most basic of laws they were required to comply with before designing the damn thing with an unnecessary step.
- fuzzfactor 29d agoThat's the problem right there, only with "bureaucracy as usual" it can be virtually forbidden to do any root cause analysis. That could be so shocking that the whole chain-of-command could have a heart attack :\