You seem to get my point at the beginning of your comment when you acknowledge that it's possible there's a kernel of truth in the form of a boat. But then by t

You seem to get my point at the beginning of your comment when you acknowledge that it's possible there's a kernel of truth in the form of a boat. But then by the end of your comment, you for some reason concluded that the vessel described in Genesis is not plausible. No kidding. We weren't talking about the vessel as described in genesis, we were talking about the boat that may have possibly existed at some point which may have inspired the story. Unless you're saying this guy built the boat as described in Genesis. But that wouldn't make sense, because it's not plausible from an engineering perspective, and well, this guy built it, so his boat is plausible from an engineering perspective.