6 ms·

Gitlab

151 points by dotmanish 14y ago

guptaneil 14y ago
Just curious, why is this hosted on Github instead of on a self-hosted Gitlab instance?
- rsobers 14y ago
  My guess: discoverability. Also, Gitlab is for self-hosted Git repos--probably aimed mostly at private projects, not open source. Gitlab itself is open source, so it seems logical to put it on the site that contains the largest gallery of open source projects in the world.
- jamesmoss 14y ago
  https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/1085 https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/1085 The authors use Github because they want to make it easier for people to contribute to Gitlab.
- ariejan 14y ago
  Gitlab is not a 'github replacement' to run public projects, it's sole focus is private repositories on your own server.
  - 1qaz2wsx3edc 14y ago
    So it's more of a `github enterprise replacement`, got it.
    - rsobers 14y ago
      Still not quite right. Github enterprise requires that you pay Github to license the software and provide support. Gitlab is free and open source -- you can clone Gitlab and start doing git project hosting without paying or contacting anyone. (NB: I have no involvement with Gitlab.)
      - cdcarter 14y ago
        I think it would still qualify as a replacement, just an open one.
  - mlinksva 14y ago
    Akin to gitorious' rationale for not including an issue tracker. It is also targeting in-house development (and in gitorious' case, assuming will need to integrate with existing issue systems eg https://issues.gitorious.org/issues/41#note-11 https://issues.gitorious.org/issues/41#note-11 says along those lines). Odd result is that Github is significantly easier to deal with for an open source project than are its open source alternatives.
- sytse 14y ago
  Right now GitLab doesn't have public repo's http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3159951-allow-public-repositories http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestion...
xal 14y ago
Trying to build a largish software project without tooling for Pull Requests seems almost foolish.
- Kudos 14y ago
  You mean like this? http://gitlabhq.com/images/screens/gitlab_project_mr.png http://gitlabhq.com/images/screens/gitlab_project_mr.png
  - tpz 14y ago
    Not quite. Gitlab merge requests are very useful but only act between branches of a single repo, not across repos. Hence "merge" request, not "pull" request.
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
rel 14y ago
We just moved over to Gitlab from just pure gitolite and it is such a great tool. Certain things like opening and assigning issues, wiki pages, merge requests, all on our private servers are amazing. I highly suggest running Gitlab on your servers if you're not comfortable with github or would rather have things on your own servers.
- Posibyte 14y ago
  We used it for a Software Engineering project in college just this last semester. We were instructed that (as a fake client) that they needed a way to do internal reviews through a separate agency (all fake). Of course, we initially only used it to solve that issue in our fake software design, but the flexibility and ease of use caused us to replace the internal Comp Sci repository system with it. We're more than pleased with it. Both the faculty and students so far seem to enjoy it a lot more than the previous (decrepit) SVN system. The chair of the department loves Git, but couldn't find a decent (open source) web solution that could be hosted on our systems (as in not Github). Gitlab is an amazing solution.
ejpastorino 14y ago
Kind of old. The UI looks completely different now.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
- ariejan 14y ago
  Agree. GoM did some design work a while back, but the gitlab project is moving forward at an incredible pace, so the GoM portfolio site is a bit out of date with the current state of affairs.
- maxvs 14y ago
  I've recently discovered GitLab and known only current UI. After seeing those old UI screenshoots I think previous interface was better. Current version is highly "inspired" by GitHub (which has very good UI imo) but somehow has worse UI/UX for me (but I'm using it only for a month or 2, so maybe it's just my first impression). I wish there was some kind of "theme" module for GitLab.
cnp 14y ago
Just set up a gitlab instance at work, with a patch for creating public repos: A++
- sytse 14y ago
  Cool! Consider contributing your patch to the GitLab project, many people have indicated interest: http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3159951-allow-public-repositories http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestion... I run GitLab.com and it would be great to have public repo's
  - cnp 14y ago
    I followed these instructions and it worked like a charm: http://shanetully.com/2012/08/gitlab-internally-public-projects/ http://shanetully.com/2012/08/gitlab-internally-public-proje...
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
j45 14y ago
If you're looking to poke around and try out Gitlab, it's very nice... but it has a few unsightly snags to install that will turn away 90% of people who just want to try it out... (including how to guides have the usual open-source vapidly miss obvious steps, requires a specific build of Ruby, etc), the latest version of Gitlab doesn't support certain versions of Ruby, and some required libraries are awaiting updating. The best angle to go with is to download an appliance VPS with Gitlab already installed and fool around with upgrading it from there..
- mbreese 14y ago
  The difficulty in getting it to work with CentOS/RHEL is another problem for me. Focusing on Ubuntu is nice, but we run CentOS on our servers and even trying out the software on that distro is quite difficult. Or at least it was when I tried it last week. Anyone have any success with that?
  - bchen 14y ago
    Just installed Gitlab successfully on RHEL6. Some modifications to the installation steps: - I used RVM to install Ruby 1.9.3. This should be fairly straightforward. - adduser command has a different interface on RHEL, but it shouldn’t be hard to figure out. - I used Apache ProxyPass instead of Nginx. unicorn.rb needed to be updated to listen on a tcp port instead of a socket file. - Supplied init.d script did not work out of box. Some modifications were required. - Redis server was installed from REMI. Let me know where you’re stuck and I can try to help you. I agree that Gitlab is not very easy to install, as there are many complicated steps. The benefits of having a free private GitHub, though, were totally worth it.
  - Zaeleus 14y ago
    Here are my notes for when I tried installing Gitlab on a fresh install of CentOS 6.3 a couple of months ago. It goes up to the point of running `rails server` to get you started, and the rest is like setting up a normal Rails application. https://gist.github.com/4362544 https://gist.github.com/4362544
  - sytse 14y ago
contingencies 14y ago
We've been using it a few months and really like it. Now we're looking to integrate it with Phrabricator (http://www.phabricator.com/ http://www.phabricator.com/) which is a bit of a do-everything-goliath of systems but we hope will enable us to do some formalization of code reviews, security audits, and thus our deployment/release processes. (Ideally we want these cryptographically signed off on.) Has anyone had good experience integrating GitLab with Phabricator or other external tools? Recommendations? Gotchas?
- chrisbolt 14y ago
  Phabricator and GitLab seem to have a lot of overlapping functionality (repo browsing, code review, wiki, issue tracking). What does GitLab add that Phabricator doesn't have?
  - contingencies 14y ago
    We started off with GitLab so we're kind of used to it. It provides the following powerful anti-features: it's both more polished and far easier to use than Phabricator, which encourages lots of useful but esoteric and BOFH-style development processes like forced test plans, test coverage analysis, and pre-commit code reviews that take time for people to get used to. Basically we're looking to leverage some more of these over time as we find the time to invest in the learning curve, without throwing away our lovely, easy to use, already functional, and far more polished GitLab system.
bejar37 14y ago
-

Gitlab

151 points by dotmanish 14y ago

guptaneil 14y ago

Just curious, why is this hosted on Github instead of on a self-hosted Gitlab instance?

rsobers 14y ago
My guess: discoverability. Also, Gitlab is for self-hosted Git repos--probably aimed mostly at private projects, not open source. Gitlab itself is open source, so it seems logical to put it on the site that contains the largest gallery of open source projects in the world.
jamesmoss 14y ago
https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/1085 https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/1085 The authors use Github because they want to make it easier for people to contribute to Gitlab.
ariejan 14y ago
Gitlab is not a 'github replacement' to run public projects, it's sole focus is private repositories on your own server.
- 1qaz2wsx3edc 14y ago
  So it's more of a `github enterprise replacement`, got it.
  - rsobers 14y ago
    Still not quite right. Github enterprise requires that you pay Github to license the software and provide support. Gitlab is free and open source -- you can clone Gitlab and start doing git project hosting without paying or contacting anyone. (NB: I have no involvement with Gitlab.)
    - cdcarter 14y ago
      I think it would still qualify as a replacement, just an open one.
- mlinksva 14y ago
  Akin to gitorious' rationale for not including an issue tracker. It is also targeting in-house development (and in gitorious' case, assuming will need to integrate with existing issue systems eg https://issues.gitorious.org/issues/41#note-11 https://issues.gitorious.org/issues/41#note-11 says along those lines). Odd result is that Github is significantly easier to deal with for an open source project than are its open source alternatives.
sytse 14y ago
Right now GitLab doesn't have public repo's http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3159951-allow-public-repositories http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestion...

xal 14y ago

Trying to build a largish software project without tooling for Pull Requests seems almost foolish.

Kudos 14y ago
You mean like this? http://gitlabhq.com/images/screens/gitlab_project_mr.png http://gitlabhq.com/images/screens/gitlab_project_mr.png
- tpz 14y ago
  Not quite. Gitlab merge requests are very useful but only act between branches of a single repo, not across repos. Hence "merge" request, not "pull" request.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

rel 14y ago

We just moved over to Gitlab from just pure gitolite and it is such a great tool. Certain things like opening and assigning issues, wiki pages, merge requests, all on our private servers are amazing. I highly suggest running Gitlab on your servers if you're not comfortable with github or would rather have things on your own servers.

Posibyte 14y ago
We used it for a Software Engineering project in college just this last semester. We were instructed that (as a fake client) that they needed a way to do internal reviews through a separate agency (all fake). Of course, we initially only used it to solve that issue in our fake software design, but the flexibility and ease of use caused us to replace the internal Comp Sci repository system with it. We're more than pleased with it. Both the faculty and students so far seem to enjoy it a lot more than the previous (decrepit) SVN system. The chair of the department loves Git, but couldn't find a decent (open source) web solution that could be hosted on our systems (as in not Github). Gitlab is an amazing solution.

ejpastorino 14y ago

Kind of old. The UI looks completely different now.

deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
ariejan 14y ago
Agree. GoM did some design work a while back, but the gitlab project is moving forward at an incredible pace, so the GoM portfolio site is a bit out of date with the current state of affairs.
maxvs 14y ago
I've recently discovered GitLab and known only current UI. After seeing those old UI screenshoots I think previous interface was better. Current version is highly "inspired" by GitHub (which has very good UI imo) but somehow has worse UI/UX for me (but I'm using it only for a month or 2, so maybe it's just my first impression). I wish there was some kind of "theme" module for GitLab.

cnp 14y ago

Just set up a gitlab instance at work, with a patch for creating public repos: A++

sytse 14y ago
Cool! Consider contributing your patch to the GitLab project, many people have indicated interest: http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3159951-allow-public-repositories http://gitlab.uservoice.com/forums/176466-general/suggestion... I run GitLab.com and it would be great to have public repo's
- cnp 14y ago
  I followed these instructions and it worked like a charm: http://shanetully.com/2012/08/gitlab-internally-public-projects/ http://shanetully.com/2012/08/gitlab-internally-public-proje...

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

j45 14y ago

If you're looking to poke around and try out Gitlab, it's very nice... but it has a few unsightly snags to install that will turn away 90% of people who just want to try it out... (including how to guides have the usual open-source vapidly miss obvious steps, requires a specific build of Ruby, etc), the latest version of Gitlab doesn't support certain versions of Ruby, and some required libraries are awaiting updating. The best angle to go with is to download an appliance VPS with Gitlab already installed and fool around with upgrading it from there..

mbreese 14y ago
The difficulty in getting it to work with CentOS/RHEL is another problem for me. Focusing on Ubuntu is nice, but we run CentOS on our servers and even trying out the software on that distro is quite difficult. Or at least it was when I tried it last week. Anyone have any success with that?
- bchen 14y ago
  Just installed Gitlab successfully on RHEL6. Some modifications to the installation steps: - I used RVM to install Ruby 1.9.3. This should be fairly straightforward. - adduser command has a different interface on RHEL, but it shouldn’t be hard to figure out. - I used Apache ProxyPass instead of Nginx. unicorn.rb needed to be updated to listen on a tcp port instead of a socket file. - Supplied init.d script did not work out of box. Some modifications were required. - Redis server was installed from REMI. Let me know where you’re stuck and I can try to help you. I agree that Gitlab is not very easy to install, as there are many complicated steps. The benefits of having a free private GitHub, though, were totally worth it.
- Zaeleus 14y ago
  Here are my notes for when I tried installing Gitlab on a fresh install of CentOS 6.3 a couple of months ago. It goes up to the point of running `rails server` to get you started, and the rest is like setting up a normal Rails application. https://gist.github.com/4362544 https://gist.github.com/4362544
- sytse 14y ago

contingencies 14y ago

We've been using it a few months and really like it. Now we're looking to integrate it with Phrabricator (http://www.phabricator.com/ http://www.phabricator.com/) which is a bit of a do-everything-goliath of systems but we hope will enable us to do some formalization of code reviews, security audits, and thus our deployment/release processes. (Ideally we want these cryptographically signed off on.) Has anyone had good experience integrating GitLab with Phabricator or other external tools? Recommendations? Gotchas?

chrisbolt 14y ago
Phabricator and GitLab seem to have a lot of overlapping functionality (repo browsing, code review, wiki, issue tracking). What does GitLab add that Phabricator doesn't have?
- contingencies 14y ago
  We started off with GitLab so we're kind of used to it. It provides the following powerful anti-features: it's both more polished and far easier to use than Phabricator, which encourages lots of useful but esoteric and BOFH-style development processes like forced test plans, test coverage analysis, and pre-commit code reviews that take time for people to get used to. Basically we're looking to leverage some more of these over time as we find the time to invest in the learning curve, without throwing away our lovely, easy to use, already functional, and far more polished GitLab system.

bejar37 14y ago