3 ms·

> I am not sure what you are trying to say here. I have never had an Android system that did not have OTA updates. Everything included... I usually like to inst

> I am not sure what you are trying to say here. I have never had an Android system that did not have OTA updates. Everything included... I usually like to install the apps I want? The last bit of my sentence could easily be misread as an enumeration of three things ("microG", "OTA updates", "everything included"), but it was actually an elaboration: FP is the only vendor to support microG, and (in contrast to "unofficial" microG setups) it doesn't require sacrifices in convenience because standard features like OTA updates work just like with your average Android. Perhaps that's clearer? (Notably "Everything included" does not mean it ships a thousand apps or something. To the contrary, FP stock OS is mostly vanilla Android) Point being: I could install LineageOS on my last phone, but it was a poorly documented process, updates were a hassle (having to flash through custom recovery for lack of OTA), and I had virtually no confidence in data integrity when running major updates. > Is it better to have microG contacting the Google servers or sandboxed Play Services going through a Graphene-powered proxy? How about microG not contacting Google servers at all? In any case you're presenting an unnecessarily binary argument though. Letting Google handle push notifications is different from using them as your location provider, and both are different from letting all Play Services lose on your system.

palata 21d ago
> How about microG not contacting Google servers at all? I already addressed that in my comment, right after the line you quoted. > Letting Google handle push notifications is different from using them as your location provider, and both are different from letting all Play Services lose on your system. And what would you say GrapheneOS does of those? Do you know, or do you just assume that GrapheneOS does the worse there?
- neobrain 21d ago
  > I already addressed that in my comment, right after the line you quoted. Where? You suggested it would go through Murena instead, but you can fully disable third party services by disabling external push providers and by using on-device databases for GPS. e/OS directly offers this configuration during initial setup. > And what would you say GrapheneOS does of those? Do you know, or do you just assume that GrapheneOS does the worse there? I'm not necessarily trying to present either as "better" or "worse" since they both have their merits depending what exactly you're after (which I don't feel this is the right time/place to have a detailed rundown of). It was the root comment that posited e/OS was strictly inferior for people who care about freedom.

palata 21d ago

> How about microG not contacting Google servers at all? I already addressed that in my comment, right after the line you quoted. > Letting Google handle push notifications is different from using them as your location provider, and both are different from letting all Play Services lose on your system. And what would you say GrapheneOS does of those? Do you know, or do you just assume that GrapheneOS does the worse there?

neobrain 21d ago
> I already addressed that in my comment, right after the line you quoted. Where? You suggested it would go through Murena instead, but you can fully disable third party services by disabling external push providers and by using on-device databases for GPS. e/OS directly offers this configuration during initial setup. > And what would you say GrapheneOS does of those? Do you know, or do you just assume that GrapheneOS does the worse there? I'm not necessarily trying to present either as "better" or "worse" since they both have their merits depending what exactly you're after (which I don't feel this is the right time/place to have a detailed rundown of). It was the root comment that posited e/OS was strictly inferior for people who care about freedom.