4 ms·
Why was torrenting needed anyway? Meta could’ve easily reached out to adult media providers to work on VR headset compatibility under an NDA. Or hired a third p
by chorizo 28d ago
Why was torrenting needed anyway? Meta could’ve easily reached out to adult media providers to work on VR headset compatibility under an NDA. Or hired a third party contractor to do it.
- LoganDark 28d agoLeaks would be a very, very big problem given how aggressively they want to promote child safety and restrictions.
- darth_avocado 28d agoIt’s much more expensive. You as a consumer can buy a movie for $5 with a DVD on sale. But tos generally don’t include commercial activities. If you reach out to the film studio to get their permission, they can charge you anywhere from $10K to $1M+ for same thing. And I’m sure meta paid for some specific content but they generally wouldn’t want to set a precedent where they paid everyone.
- chorizo 28d agoMeta wants to make their service compatible with meta vr headsets. They don’t require ongoing access to the content. The media vendor would also benefit from this, so an agreement is in the interest of both parties.
- fn-mote 28d ago> And I’m sure meta paid for some specific content Are you? I don’t understand why you think this. It seems like the only payments in this area are settlements after the fact. Counterexamples welcome.
- triceratops 28d ago> But tos generally don’t include commercial activities I can't think of any ToS that prohibit a device manufacturer from testing whether the content plays on their device. That's literally why anyone buys content - to play it on their device. How would they enforce those anyway? And how would being sued for that be worse than being sued for torrenting?
- salawat 28d agoBecause that would have been the right way to do it, and if they do it right even once, they can't say "We DiDn'T KnOw aNy BeTtEr" or whatever excuse they fall back to.