3 ms·
Sure, but I don't think that's related to what you're implying, which is that, correct me if I'm wrong, the same number of weight should be able to hold many or
by nomel 1mo ago
Sure, but I don't think that's related to what you're implying, which is that, correct me if I'm wrong, the same number of weight should be able to hold many orders of magnitude more information by being reused.
These are not deterministic functions or systems that have infinite precision. See the "should I drive or walk my car to the car wash", or any of the other logic riddle problems, for examples of a statistical attractors.
- Legend2440 1mo ago>the same number of weight should be able to hold many orders of magnitude more information by being reused. No, not hold more information, perform longer computations. E.g. if you want to solve sudokus, you will need more and more loops for larger grids. There is no shortcut.