>and that type of argument could be (and probably was) used to argue against audio ("talkies"), color, surround sound, digital color correction, etc. This is l

>and that type of argument could be (and probably was) used to argue against audio ("talkies"), color, surround sound, digital color correction, etc. This is like a reverse slippery slope argument. I have not seen one quote, newspaper article, book excerpt, and so on that would back up the claim that there was widespread opposition to audio or color.