4 ms·

Here's the raw data they provided loaded into SQLite with a client side UI for querying it (loads ~80MB of content) and some GPT-5.6-Sol-generated example queri

• 123ahg 1mo ago
  [flagged]
  • seszett 1mo ago
    The edit are there on these wikis (and others not mentioned on the post, but for example on wiki4d, the dlang wiki). It's very difficult to argue for any fabrication meant to harm OpenAI when the traces are all over the internet if you look for them.
    • qajsh 1mo ago
      A fabrication would help OpenAI because its shows the sophistication of GPT-6 one day after its release. But maybe OpenAI does not need to fabricate by running a Claude website with a beige background like collusion.wiki. It knows it will get away with real spamming.
      • Maxious 1mo ago
        You can also go directly to the wikis and look them up in archive.org etc. Would be a very legally risky ARG to deface websites
        • asdfsa32 1mo ago
          Without being able to see the prompts, it is hard to make any assertions about honesty, we all know OpenAI is in trouble because they're showing ads already. And that is something that Sam has clearly marked as time of trouble for them. The website is also looks just like a PR project. It is hard to believe anything.
      • ErneX 1mo ago
        This doesn’t seem to be the just releasd model: https://x.com/peterwildeford/status/2092733480064954747 https://x.com/peterwildeford/status/2092733480064954747
  • simonw 1mo ago
    It seems credible to me. There's a chance it's fake, but the idea that OpenAI agents might exploit a wiki that accepts edits via GET doesn't seem unrealistic given what happened with the Hugging Face incident.
• CringeHNAds 1mo ago
  [flagged]
• noahbp 1mo ago
  It doesn't work on Firefox: >ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'click'
  • lxgr 1mo ago
    Works for me on Firefox.