>It's news because it's the handoff of man to machine being the best at a particular thing. That's a way to see it. Another way to see it is that for any given

>It's news because it's the handoff of man to machine being the best at a particular thing. That's a way to see it. Another way to see it is that for any given event in a zero sum game, one of two outcomes, where two players are involved, will occur. Man only had to beat machines for what, 200-400 years only for it to beat man how many times for it to be "best"?