3 ms·

I'm not quoting the author's words but their mentality, which is clear to see in their post.

• toomanyrichies 1mo ago
  You can't quote a mentality, and you're not a mind-reader. You're putting words in the author's mouth, and then arguing against them. Saying it's "clear to see" is just asking others to find your evidence for you.
  • kulahan 1mo ago
    It's just someone drawing conclusions based on what the author chose to write, which is common and fine.
    • toomanyrichies 29d ago
      Drawing conclusions is fine, if they're traceable to something on the page. This one started with "always" and "all day," which aren't in the post, and when that was pointed out it moved to the author's mentality. I can assign anyone any mentality I want, and it's impossible to prove me wrong.
  • satvikpendem 29d ago
    No, they are my conclusions of what they said, which I have assumed is clear to see for others too. You are the one taking this simple interaction way too literally.
    • toomanyrichies 29d ago
      Reading someone's words as written isn't being "too literal". With a blog post, as with this thread, it's actually the only thing there is to go on.
      • satvikpendem 29d ago
        You're not understanding metaphor and I'm not sure at this point in the comment thread I could explain it to you either.
        • deleted 29d ago
          [deleted]