Sam Altman himself has said it is not AGI unless it can discover novel physics. https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1725233117055553938 https://x.com/burny_tech/st

Sam Altman himself has said it is not AGI unless it can discover novel physics. https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1725233117055553938 https://x.com/burny_tech/status/1725233117055553938 In the tweet Sam Altman is quoted as saying: "If (for example) super intelligence can't discover novel physics I don't think it's a superintelligence. And teaching it to clone the behavior of humans and human text - I don't think that's going to get there. And so there's this question which has been debated in the field for a long time: what do we have to do in addition to a language model to make a system that can go discover new physics?" I think this is a reasonable criteria for declaring AGI. So can GPT-6 do it? OpenAI says it has helped solve long-standing open problems in mathematics. No word on novel physics.