3 ms·
That’s because AGI, like a lot of terms, has no meaning besides what each individual subjectively projects onto it.
by slopinthebag 1mo ago
That’s because AGI, like a lot of terms, has no meaning besides what each individual subjectively projects onto it.
- piloto_ciego 1mo agoI agree, like the average human isn't generally intelligent. IMO, AGI is literally no different from ASI, though people think it is. Like, Imagine you have 1,000 generally intelligent humans working for you (which nobody is really) and you were to point them at your pet project. That would be amazing!
- slopinthebag 1mo agoThe average human would have average intelligence
- defrost 1mo agoWhat's the metric on "average human" from a global population of > 8 billion people .. and why would they score mid on a standardised IQ test skewed toward western education / culture?
- slopinthebag 1mo agoWho said anything about IQ tests?
- defrost 1mo agoWhat specific metric did you have in mind for ranking intelligence and determining average intelligence in this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49560984 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49560984 You must have some notion of an argument as to why all the varied attributes of different humans should align to all be "average" in some specific human. O/wise you'd be peddling sloppy trite aphorisms that don't bear scrutiny.
- slopinthebag 1mo agoaverage still means something regardless of how you can define it.