I wouldn't trust the "human" part to be very realistic no matter how uncanny. I was thinking a more accurate scale would be subintelligent, quasiintelligent, i

I wouldn't trust the "human" part to be very realistic no matter how uncanny. I was thinking a more accurate scale would be subintelligent, quasiintelligent, intelligent and superintelligent. These seem like very logical divisions if you are going to call the whole collection "AI" to begin with. Even more realistic would probably be based on what capabilities are there, rather than things like "humanity" content or pseudo-IQ. How about subadequate, quasiadequate, adequate, and superadequate? Any way you look at it those "super" levels are going to be very challenging to validate or confirm.