4 ms·
Often there technically are other options but this is still like saying you don't need to participate in society and can move to a cabin in the woods.
by account42 2mo ago
Often there technically are other options but this is still like saying you don't need to participate in society and can move to a cabin in the woods.
- iamnothere 2mo agoWhat’s the problem? Are you saying that people who live in cabins are doing something wrong? I used to live in a cabin in the middle of nowhere. It has its downsides, but there were plenty of positives as well.
- huurtehoog 2mo agoYou can't see a difference between will and constrain? Force-feeding for example is torture, despite how much one may like eating.
- iamnothere 2mo agoAre you saying that you’re forced to use a smartphone? Because I don’t use one. It does make some things harder, but I don’t know what people are expecting. A law to ban smartphones? There’s not enough people who want that. I do think we need rules that require businesses to accept cash, and to have alternative flows that don’t require smartphones for ordinary transactions (like buying food) or financial management. I also think we need to break up the duopoly and ensure that FOSS based devices can gain a foothold. Unless more people go without smartphones, voluntarily, the friction in daily life is only going to increase for those of us who don’t use them. That means accepting a little bit of inconvenience from time to time, but you make up for it in other ways.
- huurtehoog 2mo agoNo, I'm saying that going to live in a cabin in the woods if you want to is great, not so much if you do it for running out of options. Not a hard concept to grasp. Whether smartphones are optional or not depends on a lot of factors.
- iamnothere 1mo agoI guess I don’t see what this adds to the conversation. What position exactly are you taking here? What should be done based on what you just said? I can’t tell if you’re making a real argument or if it’s an empty complaint about the status quo.