To paraphrase the article... No offence but you don't know jack about fonts ; ) I mean: zooming in on a subpixel antialiased fonts and showing us the magnifie

To paraphrase the article... No offence but you don't know jack about fonts ; ) I mean: zooming in on a subpixel antialiased fonts and showing us the magnified to try to 'make a point' !? I hope you do realize that the subpixel anti-aliasing trick is totally gone once you zoom in right? You do realize this right? If so, why do you even show that in your article? I find a bit strange that basically every single example at normal size he uses give better result for the column he names "fat & fuzzy". And that's with Chrome on an old MacBook. Interesting his colum named 'Thin & Pretty' doesn't look like white text on black background but 'uneven gray text on black background'. Freackingly ugly to read. The colum he considers 'fat' and 'fuzzy' actually looks much better. And I've typeset books using Quark XPress so I'm not 'seeing things' here: I know a thing or two about fonts ; )