4 ms·
I don’t care about what they do, I only care about what they say, that way, when compliance requires us to use LLMs that don’t train on inputs, I can point to t
by deadbabe 1mo ago
I don’t care about what they do, I only care about what they say, that way, when compliance requires us to use LLMs that don’t train on inputs, I can point to that policy and continue on using the LLM.
If they are secretly scraping input prompts, that no longer becomes my problem. Someday, a massive lawsuit comes down, and everyone gets to play the victim.
You’re naive for thinking we don’t know how this really works.
- flakeoil 1mo agoWhat they say is not the same as what they wrote in the ToS you didn't read. If they stole your stuff and used in to train their model, what does it help if there is a lawsuit some years later which you most likely have no benefit from?
- rcxdude 1mo agoHave you read their ToS? It's not that hard. This feels like this nihilistic 'law is witchcraft and the big company lawyers always have you screwed in the fineprint' when it generally is pretty comprehensible with not that much work.
- deadbabe 1mo agoBecause I can get on with my life and do my job. Let the legal departments worry about that.
- PunchyHamster 1mo ago> If they stole your stuff and used in to train their model, what does it help if there is a lawsuit some years later which you most likely have no benefit from? The point is that if someone accuses you of leaking data you can sue them for not abiding by contract, not that the data is not used for training