based on the dates, links, publishing status, and content, these seem somewhat contrived, but i will read them, when i have the chance. that first paper is on

based on the dates, links, publishing status, and content, these seem somewhat contrived, but i will read them, when i have the chance. that first paper is on academic outcomes in uraguay, with a particular set of testing that i am not familiar with. if you could fill me in, that would be great. i am also not following how they arrived at this: 'We find no statistically significant effect of FTTH exposure on children spending more than one hour per day in front of a screen – the threshold recommended by health institutions – nor on caregivers' acceptance of using screens to entertain children without supervision. We interpret this as insufficient evidence to confirm the direct channel with our data, rather than as evidence that it is not operating: our measures of screen time have significant limitations, and we cannot rule out that direct exposure is also playing a role.' but i can't see the whole paper from where i am at the moment. the other paper looks more like a magazine article, but i will try to take a look at it.