4 ms·

He's spent years telling his supporters not to vote by mail. So during the election when there are problems with the mail, those will primarily affect the other

by mrj 1mo ago

He's spent years telling his supporters not to vote by mail. So during the election when there are problems with the mail, those will primarily affect the other party. That's enough to steal an election without more steps.

dashundchen 1mo ago
Meanwhile, the piece of excrement votes by mail himself. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/17/trump-vote-by-mail-primaries-florida-01039292 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/17/trump-vote-by-mail-...
monero-xmr 1mo ago
Having bare minimum protections against invalid voters, illegal immigrants or otherwise, is a basic precaution that every country on Earth except America does. The honor system we have here is absurdly lenient. I understand the Democrat desire to oppose everything Trump proposes, but imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person, without any ID check whatsoever. Europeans might not realize this but that is literally the American system. I totally grant that the fraud Trump is claiming is way off the mark. But why not just... require ID to vote? At least in federal elections? The lack of verification is the exact reason why the lies continue
- michaelmrose 1mo ago
  [dead]
- jlebar 1mo ago
  > But why not just... require ID to vote? Among other things, consider https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-... > The lack of verification is the exact reason why the lies continue I think the evidence suggests they are not particularly constrained by reality? Recall "They're eating the cats and dogs."
- hackyhacky 1mo ago
  > imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person That's not at all how it works. Typically, you do need to present ID to register. You also need to verify your address on the day of voting. If someone does commit fraud, it's easy to detect: as soon as the real voter tries to vote, the system will detect a "double vote." The fact that this almost never happens suggests that there is not much fraud, if any. And the amount of fraud required to actually change an election result with this method would require a concerted effort of tens of thousands of people, all risking federal prosecution. > that is literally the American system. No. Please stop misrepresenting the facts. > But why not just... require ID to vote? There are lots of good reasons, which you are probably already aware of, including the fact that many people eligible to vote do not have the requisite ID and are unlikely to get it. My litmus test for supporting voter ID is that it is accompanied by (a) free, mandatory, and automatic national ID cards, and (b) national holiday on election days. Republicans won't support part A for their own ideological reasons, and moreover their purported effort to support voter integrity is not sincere: the goal is simply to prevent undesirable (i.e. non-Republican) voters from voting.
  - microtonal 1mo ago
    many people eligible to vote do not have the requisite ID and are unlikely to get it Just trying to understand as a non-American: which people are eligible to vote, but are unlikely to get an ID?
    - gorbypark 1mo ago
      Canadian here, so take with a grain of salt. Both Canada and the US don't have a national ID system, at all (short of a passport). A state/province issued driver's license is the default form of ID. If you don't have a driver's license it is very possible you don't have an ID. Most (if not all?) states and provinces will have some form of "non driving" ID available if needed. However, it is optional, costs money and requires other documentation to get it, such as an original copy of a birth certificate. It's not that uncommon for an adult to not have an official ID. Either they never had one or have lost theirs and they haven't bothered/can't afford to get a new one. The argument is that Republicans are exploiting the fact that this will disproportionately affect Democratic voters. Would some Republican voters be turned away? Of course. Would more Democratic voters be turned away than Republicans? Very very likely, and that's the point. It's a net win for one party to enforce voting ID laws while also not supporting some sort of free/cheap universal identity system.
- horsawlarway 1mo ago
  Literally, what the fuck are you talking about. As in, please be more specific with your claims that we don't require identification to vote. Because it strikes me as a very low effort Fox News talking point, not any reality. Most states allow you to cast a provisional ballot on polling Day without an ID, but require that you return and present an ID to accept it. But no state is accepting votes without identifying the voter. They just vary somewhat in what alternatives they accept. Compare your statement to the info here and come back with something better: https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state I have never voted without being required to present gov issued ID. Ever.
- gspr 1mo ago
  The comparison to western European countries doesn't hold up. Speaking from Norway: yes, it's true you have to provide ID to vote, both in national and local elections. The difference is that obtaining ID is trivial, to the point where essentially everyone here legally has ID. I wouldn't be surprised if the most common way for someone not to have ID would literally be "all of it was in my luggage and the airline lost it", or some similar very temporary state. In the US, the people who do have ID do not even form a representative sample of the population as far as I understand I can't speak for the Americans, but I would imagine there'd be far less liberal pushback against voter ID if everyone could trivially obtain it. How's this for a compromise: republicans get voter ID laws, in return for a national, bipartisanly monitored program to ensure that anyone who wants it can trivially obtain ID. Once that's realized, the voter ID laws can kick in?
  - teh_infallible 1mo ago
    You need an ID to drive, buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, board a plane. And people manage to do all those things.
    - gspr 1mo ago
      No, all people do not manage to do those things (even if they wanted to).
    - bojan 1mo ago
      You can do all that with a driving license, but a driving license is not a proof of citizenship and thus of your eligibility to vote. In Europe, you can't get a regular ID without being a citizen. So having an ID automatically means you're eligible to vote.
      - gspr 1mo ago
        > In Europe, you can't get a regular ID without being a citizen. So having an ID automatically means you're eligible to vote. Nitpick: E.g. Norwegian ID cards can be had by any legal resident. The card will say that you're not a citizen though, so your point about that stands. Re driving license: Driving license is a valid form of ID for voting here. All eligible people are on the voting rolls automatically (unlike the absurd american system), and the driving license is merely used to prove you are who you say you are.
- jjav 1mo ago
  > imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person, without any ID check whatsoever. Europeans might not realize this but that is literally the American system This is of course not true, why say clearly incorrect things? First, there is no "American system" as such, because every state is responsible for running elections, so there are 50 state systems in the US. More importantly, I get my ballot in the mail only because I'm registered to vote at the DMV, you know the same agency that issues the very ID they check to make sure I'm elegible to vote. You don't just "waltz in" to the post office or whever to get a ballot.
- ar0 1mo ago
  Voting systems in Europe differ by country, but for example here in Switzerland I just get my ballot in the mail, fill it in and send it back to get counted. And of course Swiss Post just processes this as a regular piece of mail, routing it to the address written on the envelope, without any weird cross-tabulation against voter registers or barcodes…
  - pvaldes 1mo ago
    Some years ago a postman in Spain was caught with a sack in his home with 3000 votes that never were delivered to their destiny. This happened many months after the election. Last year in December some thieves broke into a small village post office and stole the money and the sack with 124 mail votes that were found later partially burnt. The few voters involved were allowed to re-send his vote before the elections and an organization of 12 people were detained later for this an other assaults to post offices before the local elections. So yes, mail voting has a few issues still, not a lot, but is not impossible to break. If every worker in the post office is from one party and nobody in that party votes by mail, bribing and corrupting the system is doable, and even easy; specially if your work depends on it. If you do this in small populations or at scale you could easily remove enough votes from the system until winning the place by one single vote. If you are malignant enough you could even blame later millions of "lazy" people for not voting and laugh about it. Mail voting depends on trusting what your postman is not a plant.
- Arodex 1mo ago
  The GOP and Trump supporters have so far spent millions of dollars trying to prove voter fraud. Mike Lindell of my pillow has lost his fortune trying to prove it. They didn't prove any of their claims, and several even went to prison for contempt because they refused to substantiate their claims in front of a judge. HN rules says to be kind and not call names, but you are either willfully ignorant or a liar, and in both cases you are complicit in a soft coup attempt.
thisisit 1mo ago
While voting by mail himself. Yes the hypocrite-in-chief. Rules for thee, none for me.

by mrj 1mo ago

dashundchen 1mo ago

Meanwhile, the piece of excrement votes by mail himself. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/17/trump-vote-by-mail-primaries-florida-01039292 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/17/trump-vote-by-mail-...

monero-xmr 1mo ago

Having bare minimum protections against invalid voters, illegal immigrants or otherwise, is a basic precaution that every country on Earth except America does. The honor system we have here is absurdly lenient. I understand the Democrat desire to oppose everything Trump proposes, but imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person, without any ID check whatsoever. Europeans might not realize this but that is literally the American system. I totally grant that the fraud Trump is claiming is way off the mark. But why not just... require ID to vote? At least in federal elections? The lack of verification is the exact reason why the lies continue

michaelmrose 1mo ago
[dead]
jlebar 1mo ago
> But why not just... require ID to vote? Among other things, consider https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-... > The lack of verification is the exact reason why the lies continue I think the evidence suggests they are not particularly constrained by reality? Recall "They're eating the cats and dogs."
hackyhacky 1mo ago
> imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person That's not at all how it works. Typically, you do need to present ID to register. You also need to verify your address on the day of voting. If someone does commit fraud, it's easy to detect: as soon as the real voter tries to vote, the system will detect a "double vote." The fact that this almost never happens suggests that there is not much fraud, if any. And the amount of fraud required to actually change an election result with this method would require a concerted effort of tens of thousands of people, all risking federal prosecution. > that is literally the American system. No. Please stop misrepresenting the facts. > But why not just... require ID to vote? There are lots of good reasons, which you are probably already aware of, including the fact that many people eligible to vote do not have the requisite ID and are unlikely to get it. My litmus test for supporting voter ID is that it is accompanied by (a) free, mandatory, and automatic national ID cards, and (b) national holiday on election days. Republicans won't support part A for their own ideological reasons, and moreover their purported effort to support voter integrity is not sincere: the goal is simply to prevent undesirable (i.e. non-Republican) voters from voting.
- microtonal 1mo ago
  many people eligible to vote do not have the requisite ID and are unlikely to get it Just trying to understand as a non-American: which people are eligible to vote, but are unlikely to get an ID?
  - gorbypark 1mo ago
    Canadian here, so take with a grain of salt. Both Canada and the US don't have a national ID system, at all (short of a passport). A state/province issued driver's license is the default form of ID. If you don't have a driver's license it is very possible you don't have an ID. Most (if not all?) states and provinces will have some form of "non driving" ID available if needed. However, it is optional, costs money and requires other documentation to get it, such as an original copy of a birth certificate. It's not that uncommon for an adult to not have an official ID. Either they never had one or have lost theirs and they haven't bothered/can't afford to get a new one. The argument is that Republicans are exploiting the fact that this will disproportionately affect Democratic voters. Would some Republican voters be turned away? Of course. Would more Democratic voters be turned away than Republicans? Very very likely, and that's the point. It's a net win for one party to enforce voting ID laws while also not supporting some sort of free/cheap universal identity system.
horsawlarway 1mo ago
Literally, what the fuck are you talking about. As in, please be more specific with your claims that we don't require identification to vote. Because it strikes me as a very low effort Fox News talking point, not any reality. Most states allow you to cast a provisional ballot on polling Day without an ID, but require that you return and present an ID to accept it. But no state is accepting votes without identifying the voter. They just vary somewhat in what alternatives they accept. Compare your statement to the info here and come back with something better: https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state I have never voted without being required to present gov issued ID. Ever.
gspr 1mo ago
The comparison to western European countries doesn't hold up. Speaking from Norway: yes, it's true you have to provide ID to vote, both in national and local elections. The difference is that obtaining ID is trivial, to the point where essentially everyone here legally has ID. I wouldn't be surprised if the most common way for someone not to have ID would literally be "all of it was in my luggage and the airline lost it", or some similar very temporary state. In the US, the people who do have ID do not even form a representative sample of the population as far as I understand I can't speak for the Americans, but I would imagine there'd be far less liberal pushback against voter ID if everyone could trivially obtain it. How's this for a compromise: republicans get voter ID laws, in return for a national, bipartisanly monitored program to ensure that anyone who wants it can trivially obtain ID. Once that's realized, the voter ID laws can kick in?
- teh_infallible 1mo ago
  You need an ID to drive, buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, board a plane. And people manage to do all those things.
  - gspr 1mo ago
    No, all people do not manage to do those things (even if they wanted to).
  - bojan 1mo ago
    You can do all that with a driving license, but a driving license is not a proof of citizenship and thus of your eligibility to vote. In Europe, you can't get a regular ID without being a citizen. So having an ID automatically means you're eligible to vote.
    - gspr 1mo ago
      > In Europe, you can't get a regular ID without being a citizen. So having an ID automatically means you're eligible to vote. Nitpick: E.g. Norwegian ID cards can be had by any legal resident. The card will say that you're not a citizen though, so your point about that stands. Re driving license: Driving license is a valid form of ID for voting here. All eligible people are on the voting rolls automatically (unlike the absurd american system), and the driving license is merely used to prove you are who you say you are.
jjav 1mo ago
> imagine if in The Netherlands you can waltz in and say you are this person or that person, without any ID check whatsoever. Europeans might not realize this but that is literally the American system This is of course not true, why say clearly incorrect things? First, there is no "American system" as such, because every state is responsible for running elections, so there are 50 state systems in the US. More importantly, I get my ballot in the mail only because I'm registered to vote at the DMV, you know the same agency that issues the very ID they check to make sure I'm elegible to vote. You don't just "waltz in" to the post office or whever to get a ballot.
ar0 1mo ago
Voting systems in Europe differ by country, but for example here in Switzerland I just get my ballot in the mail, fill it in and send it back to get counted. And of course Swiss Post just processes this as a regular piece of mail, routing it to the address written on the envelope, without any weird cross-tabulation against voter registers or barcodes…
- pvaldes 1mo ago
  Some years ago a postman in Spain was caught with a sack in his home with 3000 votes that never were delivered to their destiny. This happened many months after the election. Last year in December some thieves broke into a small village post office and stole the money and the sack with 124 mail votes that were found later partially burnt. The few voters involved were allowed to re-send his vote before the elections and an organization of 12 people were detained later for this an other assaults to post offices before the local elections. So yes, mail voting has a few issues still, not a lot, but is not impossible to break. If every worker in the post office is from one party and nobody in that party votes by mail, bribing and corrupting the system is doable, and even easy; specially if your work depends on it. If you do this in small populations or at scale you could easily remove enough votes from the system until winning the place by one single vote. If you are malignant enough you could even blame later millions of "lazy" people for not voting and laugh about it. Mail voting depends on trusting what your postman is not a plant.
Arodex 1mo ago
The GOP and Trump supporters have so far spent millions of dollars trying to prove voter fraud. Mike Lindell of my pillow has lost his fortune trying to prove it. They didn't prove any of their claims, and several even went to prison for contempt because they refused to substantiate their claims in front of a judge. HN rules says to be kind and not call names, but you are either willfully ignorant or a liar, and in both cases you are complicit in a soft coup attempt.

thisisit 1mo ago

While voting by mail himself. Yes the hypocrite-in-chief. Rules for thee, none for me.