2 ms·
> gets hold of leaked numbers that nobody else has, for example - but he then wraps those numbers in his own extremely biased commentary. You can think of your
by jesterson 1mo ago
> gets hold of leaked numbers that nobody else has, for example - but he then wraps those numbers in his own extremely biased commentary.
You can think of yourself and draw your own conclusions (or we have completely lost the aptitude since "ai" started off?). You don't have to agree with Ed, or even follow his conclusions.
- simonw 1mo agoLike I said, "This makes it much harder to evaluate how credible the new information is."
- jesterson 1mo agoI still fail to see the problem here. If you disagree with numbers / conclusions he makes, I would be happy to hear/read your opinion on that (no sarcasm at all). It makes me a bit concerned seeing how many people say oh he is this and that so I wouldn't even read or help him. For G'ds sake, what happened to healthy discussions? If you disagree, lets just share opinions and let people judge. But if we just recuse ourselves from it, it will let opinions unchallenged.