2 ms·
Please don't use LLMs for landing pages. Regardless of how long you've been developing the project, many people base their first impressions on whether a real p
by LoganDark 2mo ago
Please don't use LLMs for landing pages. Regardless of how long you've been developing the project, many people base their first impressions on whether a real person curated the documentation and website. And if you didn't, then they might never even get to evaluating your code at all.
- mohebifar 2mo agoThanks. I totally hear you and that makes sense. Content is not my forte and I get lazy when it comes to that. Will improve it.
- chr15m 1mo ago> Content is not my forte The way to get good at something is by doing it a lot. "Four things, running here" This made me want to close the tab. Take some time to think about what you've built and explain it in your own words. Get an LLM to help you with content ideas and editing, but write it yourself. It looks like a cool project.
- onoesworkacct 1mo agoYou don't need to improve your writing. You can write extremely simply and people will vastly prefer it over slop. For example, translating your landing page into normal human language: I built a compiler that compiles React code into vanilla JS. Here are some examples Vidact Start adds a bunch of server-side features - file routes, server loaders, SSR, hydration, and client navigation. You can't use class components, createRef, most of the Children helpers, or React DevTools. Or any third-party package that ships precompiled against React's runtime.
- cute_boi 1mo agoPlease use it, so i don't have to read sloppy article and sloppy code and I can block the website and its author.