3 ms·
Yeah this would be a great point if it were true and they didn’t give Mythos access to companies to fix bugs, which they did and have. It’s genuinely a difficu
by tyre 1mo ago
Yeah this would be a great point if it were true and they didn’t give Mythos access to companies to fix bugs, which they did and have.
It’s genuinely a difficult question. Not black and white. The models are really good at finding bugs, as demonstrated by people using Fable to reverse engineer. People make it sound like he’s just making it up.
- phoghed 1mo agoThis would be more convincing if mythos was something uniquely special and not something merely a couple months ahead of everyone else. It was great marketing though.
- hgoel 1mo agoThey gave access, but considering that they wouldn't even sign the "don't ban open weights" letter, it's clear they would prefer to have tight control over who they bless with that access.
- throwaway63486 1mo agoI'm the guy you replied to, apologies for using a different account I'm away from my computer now. The distinction to me is that Anthropic gives access to that model but doesn't give control. They reserve the right to cut you off if they don't like what you are doing and require you allow data retention for Fable and Mythos to ensure your are not up to any skullduggery. Meta, Alibaba, Mistral, even OpenAI has released models users can run locally and fully control. That is a whole world of difference.
- codexon 1mo agoThey gave a few of the largest companies access to mythos. Half a year later, it is still not available to everyone else.