Sometimes I see arguments of the form "what does it matter whether or not there is a real mind or mind-like construct, if the output is nonetheless just as comp

Sometimes I see arguments of the form "what does it matter whether or not there is a real mind or mind-like construct, if the output is nonetheless just as comparable?". My answer, I think, is that a more rigorous process gives me greater confidence in the output. I don't consider current LLMs very rigorous by that definition. I end up trying to add most of the rigor myself, and even then I'm not as confident.