> it seems fairly clear that A/I was providing services to organizations listed as Terrorist Organizations by the US, UK, and Canada Let's take the UK as examp

> it seems fairly clear that A/I was providing services to organizations listed as Terrorist Organizations by the US, UK, and Canada Let's take the UK as example. The organisation mentioned, Palestine Action, was indeed banned under terrorism laws. But on 13 February 2026, the UK High Court has ruled that the ban of Palestine Action under terrorism legislation is unlawful [1]. Why is that ‘fairly clear’ then? [1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c8x90q9nyzyt https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c8x90q9nyzyt