4 ms·
> Raw figures sure, for an upper bound. how many of those 340M people are actually employable? how many are children? how many are retired? permanently unable
by cobbzilla 1mo ago
> Raw figures
sure, for an upper bound.
how many of those 340M people are actually employable? how many are children? how many are retired? permanently unable to work?
subtract those out, it’s a better upper bound but still a swag
then add in all the self-employed, your swag is a little better, still a swag
your throwaway name is apt and funny
- EdZitron3 1mo agoThat’s the point of raw figures. You are asking for not raw figures. But if you do the math and subtract out another 75-100M it’s still very bad