2 ms·
You are right that "pay to send" solves the spam problem. But gmail filters spam so well that this is already a solved problem. Additionally, the sidebar ads
by dbecker 14y ago
You are right that "pay to send" solves the spam problem. But gmail filters spam so well that this is already a solved problem.
Additionally, the sidebar ads in google or facebook are auctioned off to the highest bidder. So users are already receiving improved targeting based on pay-to-send. The only problem I see this solving for users, is that they collect the money instead of facebook or google.
That is very little money on a per-user basis. So it's not solving a meaningful problem.
I agree that there is huge potential in "pay-to-send." But this marketing appears to be off-the-mark.