3 ms·
I don't understand the disagreements. >Well, I'm this close to not giving him any more stuff. >That'll teach him. The point is, unless you're paying them mon
by jere 14y ago
I don't understand the disagreements.
>Well, I'm this close to not giving him any more stuff.
>That'll teach him.
The point is, unless you're paying them money, you have nothing to threaten them with. You can't stop paying for their service (like you can with other businesses), since you weren't paying in the first place. They're a business and they're not beholden to you in any way.
Maybe it would be more clear if we had another panel explaining that Chad has no job, yet recently took a large loan from the mob. And you still decided to put your stuff in Chad's garage.
The final punchline of course is that you're not going to do anything about it.
- Dirlewanger 14y ago>The point is, unless you're paying them money, you have nothing to threaten them with. That self-righteous attitude being made fun of (i.e. That'll teach them!) is the morose self-righteousness so many of our generation feel these days when they figure out that they aren't the special flower who produces sacred works of art and are rather an id in a database who needs to be exploited for revenue somehow. No one gives a shit if you stop using Instagram over this perfectly legitimate (in my eyes) move that was unfortunately retracted. Don't announce it over Twitter, because no one is listening but yourself.