4 ms·
I love WPT (I even have a bookmark comparing all of these browsers as well as Flow[0] that I check regularly). But this is absolutely NOT how this site is mean
by culi 1mo ago
I love WPT (I even have a bookmark comparing all of these browsers as well as Flow[0] that I check regularly).
But this is absolutely NOT how this site is meant to be used. For example, Ladybird jumped from about 30% to over 70% when it added a bunch of unicode logic. Secondly, these tests aren't all even officially agreed upon standards. Some are specific to Chrome features that are still in the draft stages for W3C. Many tests are written by the developers of the engines themselves. Chrome, having a larger team, will naturally contribute many more tests relevant to whatever feature they're prioritizing
[0] https://wpt.fyi/results/?label=master&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&product=ladybird&product=servo&product=flow&aligned https://wpt.fyi/results/?label=master&product=chrome&product...
- nicoburns 1mo ago> But this is absolutely NOT how this site is meant to be used. For example, Ladybird jumped from about 30% to over 70% when it added a bunch of unicode logic. That's true, but you can dive into specific categories to get a more accurate picture and also see which sets of tests are only implemented by Chrome.