4 ms·
Okay so, let's accept for a moment that people who put stuff in Chad's garage were being dumb. How does that, in any way, justify Chad selling your stuff? Whe
by potatolicious 14y ago
Okay so, let's accept for a moment that people who put stuff in Chad's garage were being dumb.
How does that, in any way, justify Chad selling your stuff?
Whether or not people were smart trusting Instagram in the first place is an entirely separate issue from Instagram's new TOS.
- frobozz 14y agoIt doesn't, but that's not the punchline. The punchline is the reaction. People are almost enraged enough to boycott instagram over this.
- RyanZAG 14y agoThey should be boycotting instagram after this (or actually, before this). I know full well that any photo I upload to facebook/instagram/etc is no longer mine and the whole world can see it. So I definitely don't store my stuff there, it would be insane.
- gnaritas 14y ago> How does that, in any way, justify Chad selling your stuff? You aren't paying Chad to store your stuff, but Chad incurs costs for doing so; Chad has every right to sell some of it to cover his storage costs or just toss it all out on the street. Freeloaders don't have "rights".
- narcissus 14y agoCould he not have asked you to maybe pay something, instead? I mean, it's not "everything's free" and "we're selling your stuff" are the only two options here...
- gnaritas 14y agoI would imagine it's much easier to get a business to pay for use of their content than getting a free app consumer to crack open their wallet.
- sk5t 14y agoChad has made his garage available for storage without requiring or even requesting a fee. If his next step is to sell your stuff unless you come tote it away--while not actually urging you to do so--one can reasonably draw the conclusion that Chad is a scoundrel who had this plan in mind from the start.
- gnaritas 14y agoAs one should have.