3 ms·
I’ll be honest, i’ve never read text that is human written that reads as close to an LLM as your sample sounds. I think discounting Pangram’s accuracy based on
by calmoo 1mo ago
I’ll be honest, i’ve never read text that is human written that reads as close to an LLM as your sample sounds.
I think discounting Pangram’s accuracy based on that sample isn’t very reasonable. Really nobody writes like that other than LLMs!
- jedberg 1mo agoHere is another example: https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/1pyjkuf/i_find_the_conversation_around_ai_and_software/nwkvbsz/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/1pyjkuf/i_... Today Pangram says it is 100% human, which is correct. But yet I got multiple DMs when I posted it 8 months ago saying "stop posting AI slop!" in response to that comment. At the time, Pangram marked it as 50% AI. So to Pangram's credit, they got better.
- calmoo 1mo agoThat comment doesn’t read like slop in the slightest to me, so the people DMing you have a bad eye for it. Regardless, I think your ‘human’ sample is not a good indicator of the quality of pangram. I would update your priors a bit.