3 ms·
AI is really not "just software" anymore. It is able to discover facts and advance science. Hard to disagree that we're near or at the point where Artificial In
by 1970-01-01 25d ago
AI is really not "just software" anymore. It is able to discover facts and advance science. Hard to disagree that we're near or at the point where Artificial Intelligence has expanded reality into 4 quadrants:
objects that are not alive: dust, rocks, water, wood, hats, lego, aluminum, etc.
objects that are alive but not intelligent: trees, mold, staphylococcus, cancer, grapes, etc.
objects that are alive and intelligent: cats, Steven Tyler, dolphins, crows, dogs, elephants, etc.
and now intelligent but not alive: Fable, Grok, GPT, etc.
- krm01 25d agoSH is in the wrong bucket
- coolfox 25d agotoo soon
- 1970-01-01 24d agoYes, sometimes I forget the obvious. Fixed with a different Steven.
- xdennis 24d agoAm I missing something? There's no SH in what GP said. What does SH even mean?
- a_wild_dandan 24d agoGuessing SH meant Steven Hawking, who kicked the bucket. Metaphorically.
- skor 24d agotrees can be considered intelligent, trees show complex adaptive behavior that can reasonably be called a basic form of intelligence, but not a human-like intelligence, I do get your point though and can see what you're trying to say, it is interesting indeed. There is however a detail that seems important to me, who is the driver? There is no agency is there? So its just fishing for data, so its a different type, just like trees are from us. I see them more like a very compressed "book of everything" that you can spin in "infinite" ways to get your desired outcomes. So yeah, definitely not alive, intelligent? Not like our intelligence.