3 ms·

The enterprise sounds accurate. You mention performance issues with Git, but there are performance issues with this blog post.

steveklabnik 25d ago
What is your browser/OS combo? I am assuming it's the animation, we tested it thoroughly but there can always be bugs. Thank you for bringing it up!
- NoDodgeQuestion 25d ago
  Windows, Chrome, fans spin, recommend ai review
  - steveklabnik 25d ago
    Thanks, I'm a Windows user and use Chrome myself, and on my machine it works great, but it's a pretty beefy box. I mentioned this downthread to someone else, but I've filed a bug internally and we'll make sure that it's better optimized. Thank you for the report, it's truly helpful.
- pwdisswordfishq 24d ago
  Firefox on Linux
saghm 25d ago
If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.
- steveklabnik 25d ago
  While this is true, we do care about performance tremendously, and the animation not having good performance cuts against that, so I think it's a very fair criticism. Paying attention to details matters.
  - saghm 24d ago
    That's reasonable. I mostly just found the framing to be unfair rather than the criticism itself; it feels kind of disingenuous to try to draw a connection between performance of git and performance of a webpage IMO
- pwdisswordfishq 24d ago
  > the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers No one has agreed to this premise. You have invented it out of nowhere.
  - saghm 24d ago
    I'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I think it's silly.

steveklabnik 25d ago

What is your browser/OS combo? I am assuming it's the animation, we tested it thoroughly but there can always be bugs. Thank you for bringing it up!

NoDodgeQuestion 25d ago
Windows, Chrome, fans spin, recommend ai review
- steveklabnik 25d ago
  Thanks, I'm a Windows user and use Chrome myself, and on my machine it works great, but it's a pretty beefy box. I mentioned this downthread to someone else, but I've filed a bug internally and we'll make sure that it's better optimized. Thank you for the report, it's truly helpful.
pwdisswordfishq 24d ago
Firefox on Linux

saghm 25d ago

If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.

steveklabnik 25d ago
While this is true, we do care about performance tremendously, and the animation not having good performance cuts against that, so I think it's a very fair criticism. Paying attention to details matters.
- saghm 24d ago
  That's reasonable. I mostly just found the framing to be unfair rather than the criticism itself; it feels kind of disingenuous to try to draw a connection between performance of git and performance of a webpage IMO
pwdisswordfishq 24d ago
> the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers No one has agreed to this premise. You have invented it out of nowhere.
- saghm 24d ago
  I'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I think it's silly.