4 ms·
> The distinction is meaningless IMO. Not when discussing whether it's an LLM. The second L in LLM does have a meaning.
by kgwgk 1mo ago
> The distinction is meaningless IMO.
Not when discussing whether it's an LLM. The second L in LLM does have a meaning.
- shsshs 1mo ago[flagged]
- kgwgk 1mo agoYou're the first! Congratulations.
- fc417fc802 1mo agoI'd argue that meaningful sequences of symbols constitute a language. This example doesn't use a human language but it does use a language IMO (at least AFAIU).
- dfdydx 1mo agoAre number sequences a language?
- fc417fc802 1mo agoAre rectangles squares? I can express a passage written in english as a sequence of numbers (ie tokens).