2 ms·
Ah yes so the 4x slower isn’t really a real world case and you’d have to explicitly measure yours - it’s not a fixed slowdown but depends on table size - and it
by IanCal 1mo ago
Ah yes so the 4x slower isn’t really a real world case and you’d have to explicitly measure yours - it’s not a fixed slowdown but depends on table size - and it’s for doing many many single inserts in a row, which you’d be batching either way.
- Izkata 1mo agoThat's probably why they gave a range in their original comment.
- IanCal 1mo agoWhich isn’t correct, either for real world cases or worst case linear inserts.
- WatchDog 1mo agoHow is it not correct? Sure the benchmark does not measure a real world application, but I never claimed it was. Do you have a better benchmark to share? I thought I was being charitable by using a benchmark published by the database's own authors.