3 ms·
I consider current length of copyright to be extremely too long. On other hand I also think that creators should be compensated when their creations are used t
by Ekaros 1mo ago
I consider current length of copyright to be extremely too long.
On other hand I also think that creators should be compensated when their creations are used to train AI models and this compensation should be substantial per company. And to any fallacious person telling about humans also "learning". Well humans brains are not replicated en masse just yet. And single learned person is not made to millions of copies and made to answer inane queries day and night...
- beej71 1mo agoI disagree with restrictions on digestive use of a work. If I legally acquire a book, I should be able to run that data through an algorithm, and I should be allowed to share the result freely as long as it's not replicating the original.
- Ekaros 1mo agoMy biggest contention is the acquiring price for such use. I hold that for such use the cost such be significantly higher than just if you were buying book for reading.
- beej71 1mo agoI see setting such pricing to be an impossible task. What should be the fee for me sharing the computed word count of a book, an uncopyrightable figure? We'd likely agree that a large payment should not be required in that case. And now we have to somehow legally define all these shades of gray, statistics, book summaries—a mess.