4 ms·
GrapheneOS may skip Pixel 11 over missing hardware security feature
- ErenayDev 1mo agoAlready discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49490702 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49490702
- ranger_danger 1mo agoWhy do they even rely on a proprietary black-box security chip? You know, the one that Google pinky-promised to open-source, but never did.
- hurfdurf 1mo agoJust happened that Tensor was the only SoC which supports/supported the features they defined as minimum requirements for GOS, see https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices . The coming GOS-compatible phone from Motorola will use a Snapdragon, iirc.
- hojofpoj 1mo agoIf Google was laughing I don't think they'll keep laughing as things develop from here. Stone soup is the nature of these ecosystems, if being a graphene selected vendor gives Motorola a leg up (or back?) what will another vendor do when copying a success? Google could try to take their toys and go home by breaking the API but then certain sectors will require an iPhone for legal requirements.
- 627467 1mo agoTrending (again) on the day they say they may support pixel 11 after all: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117179231167297908 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117179231167297908
- hurfdurf 1mo agoGuess you meant to link to https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117194007157499435 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117194007157499435 ?
- fithisux 1mo agoAre they supporting Raspberry Pi 5? It has very rich hardware.