35 ms·
> when you could run Darwin That's what this is. Darwin isn't installable today. Apple just dumps a bunch of source code. Previous attempts at making Darwin bo
by seabrookmx 1mo ago
> when you could run Darwin
That's what this is. Darwin isn't installable today. Apple just dumps a bunch of source code. Previous attempts at making Darwin bootable didn't go far and had no GUI.
- gnuplustoejam 1mo agoFour years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. There's also PureDarwin (?) which had been around forever but last I recall the lone developer was seriously ill and the project was not receiving help. I don't see how this would be any different. To everyone here cheering this on: when will you be contributing? Or are you just waiting to download it, run it once for the lulz, and drag it to the Trash?
- jdiff 1mo ago> Four years and still pre-alpha. Stick a fork in it. Who jammed a toe in your cheerios?
- gnuplustoejam 1mo agoWhat will you personally be contributing to the project to help move things along? Besides accolades on HN of course. I'm being real here and frankly blind, empty support of open-source projects does zero to support them.
- jdiff 1mo agoI'm actually the head lead developer in chief president. Now, your cheerios?
- cxr 1mo ago(For those not catching on that the claim was written in jest, the person commenting here is not the creator of this project nor have they committed any code.)
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- pythonaut_16 1mo agoWhat? You're the one attacking this project. Or attacking everyone in this thread? Like seriously, what do you want here? Or are you just mad at everyone and lashing out?
- yeko 1mo agoHave you taken a look at the source? A lot of code is missing, and more gets redacted with every release. It's pretty clear apple don't welcome contributions and make source buildable