> I agree that requirements need to be kept in check to avoid over engineering Then we are in agreement! The person who originally called it "overengineered"

> I agree that requirements need to be kept in check to avoid over engineering Then we are in agreement! The person who originally called it "overengineered" wasn't me, it was another user. I did joke that an electric doorbel "does a similar job" but that was to demonstrate that "similar" is also a judgement call. I am just saying that lukeify or anyone can call it overengineered from their point of view, similar to how GP called commercial products overengineered.