4 ms·
“Wow it’s so dangerous, we gotta regulate this, what if someone reckless took an open model and hacked the planet.”
by derwiki 26d ago
“Wow it’s so dangerous, we gotta regulate this, what if someone reckless took an open model and hacked the planet.”
- consumer451 26d agoYes, this is the best reply to my "Or, ..." that I can imagine. However, does that mean that what TFA described did not happen? Or, better question, that it could not happen? My personal hot take is, though impossible: STOP all of this, even though agentic dev completely changed my life for the better. We are just not ready for the even the possibility of the exponential. What is your take? Hot, or otherwise.
- derwiki 26d agoI don’t think we’re capable of putting toothpaste back in a tube. My hottest take is that this is all prep for agentic cyber warfare.
- mitchdoogle 26d agoThis explanation is only plausible if you ignore the details of what happened, or I guess, if you don't believe the details. Either way, it's baseless conspiracy theory, and it's very annoying and unfortunate that some people think this way. It just promotes apathy and inaction at a time when action is desperately needed.
- reasonableklout 25d agoBut all models involved in the swarm attack were unreleased OpenAI models. Meanwhile HuggingFace had to use open models for defense/forensics after the breach was discovered. It seems like the public reaction is swinging towards (1) regulate OpenAI in particular because they are incompetently handling frontier development and (2) open models will be important for defense.