3 ms·
> Even building architects will sometimes sue if you photograph the house. ? In the US there's the 1a - you can photograph anything you can see (from a public
by Ylpertnodi 2mo ago
> Even building architects will sometimes sue if you photograph the house.
? In the US there's the 1a - you can photograph anything you can see (from a public place).
In the there's the assumption you can photograph anything without a 'do not photo, military dogs' etc.
Never heard of a non-publishable building. Even gchq can be photo's.
- kube-system 2mo ago> In the US there's the 1a - you can photograph anything you can see (from a public place). Just because you can photograph it does not mean you can necessarily publish it. IP rights are a recognized exception to the 1a
- callahad 2mo agoCheck the "Freedom of Panorama" article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama - lots of restrictions around the world.
- prmoustache 1mo agoTaking photos and publishing photos are 2 different things. The first one doesn't involve copyright for a start.
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]